Let's discuss taxation, retirement, and social rights for long-term immigrants in Comoros and Japan. Japan's system is quite structured.
Comoros has a simpler tax system—income, corporate, and some indirect taxes. However, details are scarce. The social security net is underdeveloped; most rely on family or personal savings.
So, not much of a safety net in Comoros?
Not compared to Japan. Japan has a well-defined system: income tax, residence tax, consumption tax. Long-term immigrants (over a year) are considered residents and taxed on worldwide income, with exceptions.
And social security and retirement benefits?
Japan's social security system is comprehensive, including health insurance and pension plans. Eligibility generally depends on work and contributions.
So, Japan offers more security for long-term retirement planning than Comoros?
Significantly more. Comoros offers a more relaxed approach to taxation and life in general, but Japan provides a stronger safety net. It depends on individual preferences.
What are some potential downsides for immigrants in Japan?
The language barrier is a major hurdle when navigating the systems. Cultural differences can also be challenging.
Do immigrants have the same access to social services as citizens?
Generally, yes, if contributing to the system, but restrictions may apply based on visa status and length of stay.
So, Japan offers a more robust system for long-term security.
Precisely. Choose based on your priorities. Resources are available to help navigate these systems.
Excellent points. Remember to check the comments for helpful links.
Agreed.