Let's discuss taxation, retirement, and social rights for long-term immigrants in Japan and Poland.
Certainly. A comparison of their bureaucratic systems should be insightful.
For long-term residents in Japan, the tax system is quite complex. Worldwide income is taxed, encompassing income tax, residence tax, and consumption tax.
So, a significant portion of global earnings is subject to Japanese taxation. What about Poland?
Poland's system is more straightforward. While worldwide income is also taxed, double taxation treaties mitigate the burden for residents.
That's a considerable advantage. Let's move on to social security. What does Japan offer?
Japan provides a robust system including national pension and health insurance, offering coverage and future benefits.
And Poland?
Poland's social insurance (ZUS) covers pensions, healthcare, and unemployment benefits, aligning with EU standards.
What are the retirement ages in each country?
In Japan, it's generally 65, although many continue working beyond that age. Poland is gradually increasing its retirement age to 67 for both men and women.
Are there any specific requirements for immigrants to receive full pension benefits?
In Japan, at least 10 years of contributions are needed for full benefits; otherwise, a lump-sum withdrawal is possible upon departure. Poland also has contribution requirements, varying depending on individual circumstances, with options for transferring contributions within the EU.
Finally, what about healthcare accessibility for long-term immigrants?
In Japan, national health insurance provides good access to healthcare at a reasonable cost, though navigating the system in Japanese can be challenging. Poland's public healthcare system, accessed through ZUS contributions, offers most medical services but can be slow.
In both countries, long-term planning is crucial for both immigration and living. For more detailed information, visit jetoff.ai. Also, subscribe to our YouTube channel for updates.
Agreed. Thank you, Mira.
You're welcome, Leo.